A readily available, complimentary document designed to assist nursing professionals in organizing and transferring patient information. This tool typically includes sections for vital signs, medications, medical history, and specific nursing interventions, enabling a structured approach to shift changes and handoffs. An example would be a downloadable PDF document providing a fillable form with pre-defined categories to facilitate efficient data recording.
The availability of such documents offers several advantages. It promotes consistency in reporting, reduces the risk of errors during information exchange, and saves valuable time for nurses who would otherwise need to create their own forms from scratch. Historically, nurses relied on handwritten notes which were prone to illegibility and omission. The advent of these pre-formatted documents represents a significant improvement in communication and patient safety.
The succeeding sections will delve into specific types of these resources, their common features, and how to effectively utilize them within various healthcare settings. Furthermore, the discussion will encompass considerations for customizing these resources to meet the unique needs of different patient populations and clinical environments.
1. Efficiency
The clock never stops in a hospital. Each minute holds the potential to alter a patient’s trajectory. When a nurse juggles multiple responsibilities, the structured format found in readily available patient summary documents becomes a critical time-saving tool. Consider the nurse arriving for their shift, tasked with quickly assimilating the status of several patients. Without a consistent and organized format, vital time could be spent sifting through unstructured notes, attempting to decipher handwriting or locate crucial details. A well-designed patient summary document allows for rapid absorption of key information.
The impact extends beyond individual time management. In a busy emergency department, the quick access to critical data such as allergies, current medications, and recent lab results enables swift decision-making, potentially averting adverse events. A standardized, freely accessible template ensures that essential information is consistently presented. This eliminates ambiguity and reduces the cognitive load on the receiving nurse, allowing for focus on patient care instead of deciphering data. These efficiencies further reduce the probability of omissions or misinterpretations during patient handoffs.
The relationship between efficient workflow and freely available documentation is undeniable. While a patient summary document isn’t a replacement for sound clinical judgment, its a crucial instrument for optimizing processes. Its role in streamlining information transfer contributes directly to enhanced patient safety and improved utilization of nursing resources, illustrating its profound effect on the overall quality of care.
2. Accuracy
The weight of responsibility settles upon each entry made in a patients record. Accuracy, in this context, is not merely a desirable trait; it is the bedrock upon which patient care decisions are made. A freely available document, intended to streamline information, inherently carries the risk of propagating error if not meticulously maintained. The consequences can be severe, rippling through the entire care continuum. It is this understanding that casts accuracy as a paramount concern when evaluating any available template.
-
Medication Reconciliation
Consider the scenario: A patient arrives at the emergency department. The initial report indicates an allergy to penicillin, clearly documented. The available template, quickly filled, lacks a dedicated section for allergy verification. A subsequent dose of penicillin is administered, triggering an anaphylactic reaction. This highlights the danger of relying on templates that do not explicitly prompt for accurate and comprehensive medication reconciliation, a process crucial in preventing adverse drug events.
-
Vital Signs Trending
Trends in vital signs provide early warnings of potential deterioration. A pre-formatted document that fails to adequately capture the temporal sequence of vital sign measurements undermines this critical function. Imagine a patients blood pressure gradually declining over several hours. If the available template only records the most recent reading, the subtle but significant downward trend could be missed, delaying intervention and potentially leading to adverse outcomes. The structure must facilitate a clear, accurate, and chronological depiction of vital signs.
-
Allergy Documentation
The impact of accurately documenting allergies is profound. A template lacking an immediately visible field for allergies can lead to medication errors with dire consequences. Consider a situation where a patient’s allergy is buried in progress notes, not prominently displayed on the document. A nurse, working under pressure during a busy shift change, might overlook this critical information. A readily accessible and clearly designated space for allergy documentation is vital for preventing potentially life-threatening reactions.
-
Code Status
Few pieces of information carry more weight than a patients code status. Any ambiguity or error in communicating this directive can lead to ethical and legal ramifications. A free template that does not unequivocally specify the patients wishes regarding resuscitation efforts invites potential misinterpretation and inappropriate action. The absence of a clearly defined section for documenting code status is a critical flaw that undermines patient autonomy and the integrity of end-of-life care.
These scenarios illustrate the pervasive influence of accuracy within these resources. While accessibility and ease of use are essential attributes, they must never come at the expense of precision. The inherent risk of propagating error necessitates a meticulous approach to template design and utilization. Accuracy is not simply a desirable characteristic; it is the cornerstone of safe and ethical nursing practice when utilizing these readily available tools.
3. Customization
A quiet revolution occurs in hospital units daily. At its heart lies the nurse report sheet, that humble document meant to convey the essence of patient care. Readily available templates often promise a universal solution, a one-size-fits-all approach to the intricate dance of shift change. But the reality within each unit, each specialty, paints a different picture. The cardiac intensive care unit, for instance, faces a barrage of hemodynamic monitoring and specialized medication drips, far removed from the concerns of a postpartum unit focused on maternal and newborn well-being. This divergence highlights the critical need for adaptation, for customization.
A general template, while a starting point, lacks the granular detail essential for effective communication in specialized settings. Consider a busy oncology unit. Standard templates frequently overlook the specific chemotherapy regimens, the nuanced symptom management protocols, or the psychosocial support resources vital to patients undergoing cancer treatment. Relying solely on a generic form could lead to critical omissions, a failure to communicate subtle changes in a patients condition that demand immediate attention. Customization, therefore, becomes not a luxury, but a necessity. It ensures the document serves as a precise mirror reflecting the unique complexities of the care environment, facilitating informed decision-making and promoting patient safety.
The ability to tailor these documents, to add fields for specialized data, to remove irrelevant sections, transforms a generic tool into a bespoke instrument, crafted to the specific needs of a patient population. This act of personalization acknowledges the individuality of each unit and each patient, reinforcing the idea that healthcare, at its core, must be adapted to the person, not the other way around. The efficacy of those freely accessible templates is often limited by the ability to transform and tailor, ultimately making customization one of the most important and useful functions within the care environment.
4. Clarity
A dimly lit intensive care unit hummed with the muted beeps of monitors. Night staff prepared to hand over the reins to the day team. The nurse at station one, meticulously prepared the documents of his patient, Mr. Abernathy, a 72-year-old recovering from cardiac bypass surgery. The hospital, strapped for resources, had recently implemented a suite of easily accessible charting aids to reduce administrative burden. As the incoming nurse reviewed the notes on Mr. Abernathy, a nagging sense of unease grew. The report mentioned “increased agitation” but offered no context; Was it pain? Anxiety? Delirium? The document noted “PRN lorazepam administered” without specifying dose or time. The template, in its quest for brevity, had sacrificed precision, leaving critical gaps in understanding. This lack of clarity, born from an overly simplistic aid, had now placed Mr. Abernathy at risk, forcing the incoming nurse to spend precious minutes piecing together a complete picture, a delay that could prove detrimental. Clarity is not an optional element, but the essence of safe patient transitions.
The consequences of ambiguous communication extend beyond individual patient care. Consider the domino effect within a hospital unit. One unclear report leads to fragmented communication among physicians, therapists, and other members of the healthcare team. Decisions become delayed, treatment plans misaligned, and the overall quality of care diminished. The freely available templates, often downloaded and implemented without critical assessment, can inadvertently introduce these points of failure. A charting resource missing clearly defined sections for neurological assessment, respiratory status, or wound care creates fertile ground for ambiguity. The drive for efficiency should not come at the cost of comprehensive and unambiguous reporting.
Ultimately, the value of pre-designed resources hinges on the ability to foster shared understanding. A poorly designed aid can be a liability, creating more confusion than it resolves. The absence of a clear structure, standardized terminology, and unambiguous language defeats the purpose. The hospital is a battlefield, and clarity is the signal that wins wars. Only through careful consideration of the design and implementation can hospitals harness the power to improve communication, promote patient safety, and support nurses in delivering the highest quality of care.
5. Accessibility
The night shift was ending at County General. Exhaustion etched itself onto Nurse Ramirez’s face as she prepared to hand over her patients to the day team. In the pre-dawn darkness, a critical component of this handoff became sharply apparent: the patient summary. The readily available digital resources touted ease of use, but Nurse Ramirez faced a stark reality. The single computer terminal in the unit was already occupied, a bottleneck preventing immediate access to vital patient data. Backups were printed. However, the printers jammed, causing further delays. In this environment, accessibility was not merely a design feature; it was the difference between a smooth transition and potential disaster. The seemingly free template, available online, proved worthless in the face of real-world constraints. The experience underscores a vital, often overlooked aspect of these downloadable resources: true utility hinges on their availability, not just in theory, but in practice.
The practical implications of accessibility extend beyond mere physical access to the document itself. A patient summary riddled with jargon or poorly formatted, even if readily available, remains inaccessible to those unfamiliar with the specific terminology or system. Imagine a traveling nurse, unfamiliar with County Generals digital interface, struggling to decipher abbreviations and acronyms embedded within the patient records. The downloaded document, intended to clarify, becomes a source of confusion, delaying critical interventions. The burden falls on the traveling nurse to either stop and look up each acronym, delay, or possible mistake. Accessibility, in this context, demands not only ease of access but also ease of comprehension. A well-designed patient summary is one that transcends institutional boundaries, employing standardized language and clear formatting to facilitate seamless information transfer.
Ultimately, the true worth of the documents touted lies in its practicality, and their accessibility is one of the most important factors. Accessibility transcends the availability of digital files. It encompasses the ease with which information can be retrieved, understood, and utilized within the fast-paced clinical environment. The real challenge in leveraging readily available, complimentary aids is in bridging the gap between theoretical convenience and practical application. The best solutions are the ones that account for the physical and cognitive realities of the hospital, ensuring that vital patient information is always, and truly, within reach. This includes providing multiple access points, offering concise formats, and employing standardized language that is universally understood, making the free option effective in any setting.
6. Comprehensiveness
The corridors of St. Jude’s held echoes of countless patient narratives. Each chart, a chronicle, each data point a brushstroke in a larger portrait of health and ailment. The freely accessible charting resources, readily available online, promised to streamline this process, yet a nagging question remained: Could these generic frameworks capture the entirety of a patient’s story? Comprehensiveness, in this context, becomes more than a checklist; it’s the ability to paint a complete picture, to ensure no vital detail is lost in translation from one caregiver to the next.
-
Medication Administration Records (MAR) and Omissions
Consider Mrs. Eleanor Vance, a frail woman admitted for pneumonia. Her MAR, diligently recorded on the available template, listed antibiotics and routine pain medication. However, tucked away in her history were details of herbal supplements and over-the-counter remedies she regularly consumed, information not prompted by the generic form. The omission, seemingly minor, could alter the efficacy of prescribed medications, potentially leading to adverse effects. The example illustrates the importance of resources that encourage a holistic view of a patients pharmacological profile, encompassing both conventional and alternative treatments.
-
Past Medical History and Uncharted Territories
The template listed common conditions like hypertension and diabetes, neatly categorized. However, it failed to account for rare genetic disorders or unusual surgical procedures documented only in archived records. The oversight created a fragmented understanding of the patients vulnerability. The comprehensive document should be the beginning and reference point for future medical treatments for current treatment.
-
Psychosocial Considerations and the Human Element
A patients emotional state, support system, and cultural background profoundly influence their health outcomes, yet the template offered scant space for these vital factors. The readily available documents prioritized physical symptoms and vital signs, relegating the human element to an afterthought. The omission undermined the delivery of holistic care, ignoring the intricate interplay between mind, body, and social context.
-
Discharge Planning and the Road Ahead
The charting aid focused primarily on the acute phase of illness, neglecting the crucial transition back to home. It lacked sections for documenting follow-up appointments, home care instructions, or medication reconciliation upon discharge. The oversight created a discontinuity in care, leaving patients vulnerable to readmission or complications. Comprehensiveness, therefore, must extend beyond the hospital walls, encompassing the patients journey from admission to recovery.
The narrative underscores a vital truth: the effectiveness of any complimentary document depends on its ability to capture the full spectrum of patient needs. A template prioritizing comprehensiveness facilitates informed decision-making, promotes continuity of care, and ensures that no detail, however subtle, is overlooked in the ongoing quest to heal and support those in our care. The free templates can be a good starting point but need to be reviewed with a lens for capturing the full patient picture, or be edited to become more effective.
7. Legality
The specter of litigation haunts the corridors of healthcare. An incomplete or inaccurate summary, particularly one derived from a freely available template, becomes potential evidence in legal proceedings. The seemingly innocuous act of selecting a no-cost online resource carries potential ramifications if that resource lacks the necessary safeguards to ensure legal defensibility. Imagine a scenario where a patient suffers harm due to a medication error. During discovery, the patient’s legal team examines the charting records, revealing that the available template lacked a dedicated field for documenting allergies, a factor contributing to the error. The hospital, and the nurse, now face legal scrutiny, with the inadequacies of the free resource serving as evidence of negligence.
The legal implications extend beyond direct patient care errors. Consider the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), a cornerstone of patient privacy law. A template lacking adequate security measures could expose sensitive patient information to unauthorized access, triggering a HIPAA violation with substantial financial penalties. In the pursuit of efficiency, a healthcare organization might adopt a freely available digital resource without properly assessing its compliance with HIPAA regulations. A data breach ensues, compromising patient confidentiality and resulting in legal action. The incident underscores the importance of due diligence in evaluating the security features of any downloadable resource, regardless of cost.
The connection between legal compliance and complimentary summary is not merely theoretical. It represents a practical imperative for healthcare professionals. A thorough assessment of any chosen aid must include a careful review of its ability to capture relevant legal and regulatory requirements. The availability of such aids does not absolve healthcare providers of their responsibility to ensure accuracy, completeness, and confidentiality. Failure to do so can expose both individuals and organizations to significant legal risk, transforming a cost-saving measure into a costly and potentially devastating liability.
8. Confidentiality
The concept of inviolable secrecy is interwoven into the fabric of healthcare. This is not merely a guideline; it stands as an ethical and legal obligation to protect patient’s personal information. A readily available resource, intended to streamline communication, presents unique challenges to maintaining this trust. Consider a scenario unfolding in a bustling emergency department. A nurse, working under pressure, utilizes a freely available online summary, pre-formatted and easily accessible. This template, while efficient, lacks robust security features. A misplaced document, inadvertently left on a public computer, exposes a patient’s medical history, including sensitive details about mental health and substance abuse. The incident represents a breach of confidentiality, eroding patient trust and potentially leading to legal repercussions for both the nurse and the hospital. A patient’s medical history and information are sacred, to be guarded from prying eyes.
The consequences of compromised information extends beyond individual privacy violations. The proliferation of digital resources, often distributed without adequate security protocols, creates a fertile ground for data breaches. A malicious actor gains access to a hospital’s network, stealing thousands of easily available summaries containing patient names, social security numbers, and medical diagnoses. The breach not only violates patient privacy but also exposes them to potential identity theft and discrimination. The incident underscores the urgent need for healthcare organizations to prioritize data security when implementing free solutions. They must ensure that all such tools are compliant with privacy regulations, and that adequate measures are in place to prevent unauthorized access. Regular audits, encryption protocols, and strict access controls become essential safeguards in protecting patient information and upholding the ethical obligation of confidentiality.
Ultimately, the reliance on complimentary resources requires a vigilant approach to data security. The promise of streamlined communication must not come at the expense of patient privacy. By implementing robust security measures, adhering to ethical guidelines, and fostering a culture of confidentiality, healthcare professionals can harness the benefits of these resources while safeguarding the trust placed in them by patients. Any institution relying on free online resources needs to be particularly vigilant about the access and protection that is provided to personal medical information. This proactive stance is essential for maintaining the integrity of the healthcare system and upholding the fundamental right to privacy, without which a strong patient relationship cannot exist.
9. Standardization
The story begins in a sprawling metropolitan hospital, a place where lives intersect and the pace rarely slows. Here, a newly graduated nurse, eager to apply the skills learned in academia, encountered a stark reality: the absence of uniformity. Patient summaries, intended to be concise and informative, varied wildly from shift to shift, unit to unit. The root cause of this chaos wasn’t malice or incompetence, but the well-intentioned use of freely available templates, each downloaded from different sources and reflecting the creator’s individual preferences. The result was a Tower of Babel, where critical information became obscured by inconsistent formatting and idiosyncratic abbreviations. The novice nurse struggled to discern vital data amidst the clutter, a struggle that jeopardized patient safety and eroded confidence. Standardization, therefore, emerges not as an abstract concept, but as the linchpin holding the system together. Without it, the promise of streamlined communication collapses, replaced by the frustrating and dangerous reality of fragmented information.
The implications extend beyond individual nurses and their immediate struggles. In a hospital system striving for efficiency and accountability, a lack of uniform patient summaries hinders data analysis and quality improvement initiatives. Consider the challenge of tracking infection rates or adverse drug events when each unit utilizes a different charting system. Comparing data becomes an arduous task, and identifying trends or patterns becomes nearly impossible. Standardization, in this context, transforms from a mere design principle into a strategic imperative. It provides the foundation for evidence-based practice, enabling healthcare organizations to monitor their performance, identify areas for improvement, and ultimately deliver better patient care. The free resources offer potential, but only when tempered by a commitment to consistent implementation and adherence to established guidelines.
The absence of standardization causes real-world issues that go beyond daily routine. However, standardization’s success hinges on widespread adoption and consistent enforcement. The journey begins with a commitment to develop clear, concise, and comprehensive guidelines for designing and implementing patient summaries. The benefits of standardization is consistent communication which helps nurses and medical professionals make informed decisions. The initial implementation faces resistance from those accustomed to individual approaches. But with persistence, training, and ongoing support, the new standard becomes embedded in the culture of the organization. The free resources become a means to reinforce that standard, providing nurses with tools that are both effective and aligned with institutional goals. The transformation, though gradual, yields a powerful result: a system where information flows seamlessly, where errors are minimized, and where patient safety is paramount.
Frequently Asked Questions
The path to effective nursing practice is often paved with questions. Utilizing readily available patient summaries invites a new set of inquiries, particularly concerning their implementation and potential limitations. Addressing these concerns is paramount for ensuring safe and efficient patient care.
Question 1: Are readily available patient charting resources truly secure?
The digital landscape is fraught with peril. A seemingly innocuous download may harbor vulnerabilities that compromise patient confidentiality. Before implementing any free resource, healthcare organizations must conduct rigorous security audits to ensure compliance with HIPAA regulations and prevent unauthorized access to sensitive data. Verify encryption protocols, access controls, and data storage practices. The cost of complacency far outweighs the price of vigilance.
Question 2: Can freely available templates be adapted to specific patient populations?
A one-size-fits-all approach rarely succeeds in healthcare. While generic templates provide a foundation, they often lack the specificity required for specialized patient populations. Consider the nuanced needs of pediatric patients, those undergoing cancer treatment, or individuals with complex mental health conditions. Customization is essential for capturing the unique aspects of each patient’s care plan, ensuring accurate and comprehensive communication. Assess existing templates critically, identifying areas where adaptation is necessary to meet the demands of a specific clinical setting.
Question 3: How can standardization be achieved when utilizing various charting resources?
Fragmentation breeds confusion. The adoption of a multitude of charting aids without a cohesive framework can lead to chaos and miscommunication. Standardization is paramount. Healthcare organizations should establish clear guidelines for template selection, formatting, and data entry. Conduct regular training sessions to ensure all staff members are proficient in using the approved templates. Foster a culture of consistency to minimize variability and promote seamless information transfer between caregivers. A uniform approach mitigates risk and enhances patient safety.
Question 4: What measures are in place to ensure data accuracy when using patient records?
Precision is paramount. The integrity of readily available templates hinges on the accuracy of the information they contain. Implement rigorous verification protocols to minimize errors and omissions. Encourage nurses to double-check all entries, particularly medication dosages and allergy information. Foster a culture of accountability, where accuracy is valued above speed. The lives of patients depend on the diligence of those entrusted with their care. The cost of an error can be devastating.
Question 5: How can healthcare organizations balance efficiency with comprehensiveness in easily available templates?
The pursuit of efficiency must not come at the expense of thoroughness. While brevity is desirable, it is crucial to avoid sacrificing vital details in the name of expediency. Strike a delicate balance between concise reporting and complete documentation. Encourage nurses to prioritize critical information, while ensuring that all relevant aspects of the patient’s condition are captured. Regularly evaluate existing templates, seeking feedback from nurses to identify areas where improvements can be made without compromising either efficiency or comprehensiveness.
Question 6: What are the legal considerations associated with using freely available charting resources?
The shadow of liability looms large. Healthcare organizations must be mindful of the legal ramifications associated with using downloadable charting aids. Ensure that all templates comply with relevant regulations, including HIPAA and state-specific privacy laws. Maintain meticulous records of all template modifications and updates. Seek legal counsel to review and approve all charting resources before widespread implementation. The cost of preventative measures pales in comparison to the potential consequences of negligence.
The questions highlighted represent only a starting point. The effective use of readily available documents demands a commitment to continuous evaluation and adaptation. By addressing these concerns proactively, healthcare organizations can harness the benefits of these resources while safeguarding patient safety and upholding ethical obligations.
The following section will synthesize these elements, providing a framework for optimal utilization within diverse healthcare environments.
Practical Insights for Utilizing Complimentary Documentation Aids
A crucial moment arrives as the shift changes; a seamless transition to ensure a patient’s well-being isn’t jeopardized. The following insights have been carefully curated to optimize their utilization and mitigate potential risks, allowing professionals to navigate the nuances of documentation with greater confidence.
Tip 1: Scrutinize Security Protocols. In a large clinic, one staff member sought a free and accessible download. She knew, however, the responsibility that came with protecting the patients’ information and the hospital’s liabilities. Any summary used should be evaluated for compliance with HIPAA and equivalent regulations, encryption strength, and access restrictions. A data breach arising from a poorly secured template can lead to severe legal and reputational consequences. Prioritize patient data protection.
Tip 2: Tailor Generic Structures. A medical professional sought to save time with pre-formatted patient updates. When their clinic took in a specialty population, a serious error occurred due to an omitted field. The template must be custom-tailored. The document should be modified and expanded to include sections relevant to specific patient populations and clinical settings. Generic frameworks are a starting point, but adaptation ensures comprehensive information capture and mitigates the risk of overlooking vital details. Don’t be afraid to edit to suit your own needs.
Tip 3: Enforce a Consistent Methodology. A large hospital unit was plagued by chaos, with patient updates varying wildly from nurse to nurse. Implement clear guidelines for template selection, formatting, and data entry. Consistent protocols facilitate seamless communication, improve data analysis, and reduce the potential for misinterpretation. Consistency is key.
Tip 4: Validate with Care. A critical incident occurred when a nurse, rushed during a shift change, failed to double-check medication dosages recorded on the summary. The document is only as reliable as the information it contains. Implement verification protocols to minimize errors and omissions. Foster a culture where accuracy is paramount. Errors can have serious consequences, be sure to validate all information.
Tip 5: Weigh Brevity Against Full Disclosure. A busy emergency room struggled with lengthy hand-off reports, resulting in delays and frustration. But crucial elements were left out, which further exacerbated the situation when patients were moved to other departments. Strive for a delicate balance between concise reporting and comprehensive documentation. Prioritize critical information, while ensuring that all relevant aspects of the patient’s condition are captured. A rushed job is never perfect, and no good can come from a missing element.
Tip 6: Provide Ongoing Training. A cohort of new graduates struggled to navigate the intricacies of these readily available resources, highlighting the need for structured training. Develop comprehensive training programs to familiarize staff with the approved templates, emphasizing proper usage and potential pitfalls. Regular refresher courses reinforce best practices and ensure ongoing proficiency. A new user will make a lot of mistakes, but those can be avoided with training and mentorship.
Tip 7: Seek Feedback. To improve effectiveness, encourage nurses to provide feedback on the usability and comprehensiveness of the free resources. Implement a system for tracking and addressing their concerns. This will help to enhance the free summaries. Be inclusive of feedback and remember: team work makes the dream work!
Utilizing complimentary documentation resources is a journey, not a destination. By adhering to these insights, healthcare professionals can navigate the challenges and maximize the benefits, ultimately enhancing patient safety and improving the quality of care. Using these free resources correctly can benefit the patients as well as you!
The article now concludes with a final overview, reinforcing the key messages. This will solidify understanding and call attention to those key messages.
Conclusion
The discourse has navigated the multifaceted terrain surrounding freely accessible patient handover documents. It explored their role in streamlining communication, emphasized the critical need for security and customization, and cautioned against the pitfalls of neglecting comprehensiveness and legal compliance. The availability of a “nurse report sheet template free” does not negate the professional responsibility to ensure its suitability for the specific clinical context.
The responsibility for patient safety remains paramount. The allure of a no-cost tool must never overshadow the rigorous evaluation and adaptation required to ensure its effectiveness. The pursuit of improved communication is a continuous journey, demanding diligence, vigilance, and an unwavering commitment to providing the highest quality of care. Let every template implementation be guided by the principles of accuracy, confidentiality, and patient well-being.
