Documents detailing the technical specifications for constructing a backyard swimming pool, accessible without monetary cost, provide prospective pool owners with preliminary design ideas. These resources can include schematics, structural details, and material lists, allowing individuals to visualize and potentially begin the planning phase of pool construction. For example, a homeowner contemplating an in-ground rectangular pool might search for readily available documents outlining standard dimensions and excavation requirements.
The accessibility of these documents democratizes the pool planning process, enabling individuals to explore design options and gain a better understanding of the complexities involved. Historically, such detailed plans were exclusively available through professional architects or pool construction companies. The proliferation of readily available schematics, though often requiring modification for specific site conditions, allows for increased consumer knowledge and potentially reduces preliminary design costs. This increased awareness can lead to more informed decisions regarding pool size, shape, and overall construction feasibility.
The subsequent discussion will delve into the different types of these readily available documents, their limitations, and the critical need for professional consultation before undertaking any actual construction. Further examination will focus on legitimate sources for obtaining these materials and the potential risks associated with relying solely on them without expert oversight.
1. Preliminary Design Concepts
The genesis of any swimming pool project, often fueled by dreams of summer afternoons and tranquil waters, invariably begins with preliminary design concepts. These initial ideas, sketches, and rough outlines represent the raw potential of a future aquatic space. Readily available schematics act as a catalyst, sparking the imagination and providing a tangible starting point for homeowners.
-
Shape and Size Visualization
Imagine a family gathered around a kitchen table, poring over various schematics. The diagrams help them envision different pool shapes rectangular, kidney-shaped, or freeform and their corresponding sizes relative to their backyard space. A blueprint depicting a Roman-style pool might inspire a homeowner to incorporate classical architectural elements into their overall design. However, the schematics serve primarily as a starting point. They assist in defining preferred aesthetics and initial size requirements, but must be adjusted for the physical space.
-
Feature Integration Exploration
The documents often showcase potential features such as waterfalls, spas, or integrated seating areas. An individual might review a schematic detailing a vanishing-edge pool and contemplate its suitability for their sloping property. Another might explore blueprints with built-in sun shelves to maximize relaxation spaces. While such documents offer inspiring ideas, integration feasibility depends heavily on site conditions, budget considerations, and structural requirements. They must be interpreted as possibilities rather than concrete plans.
-
Budgetary Framework
Though not directly providing exact cost estimates, these readily available blueprints can offer insight into the scope of materials and labor required. A schematic illustrating a complex pool design with intricate tiling and multiple water features may indirectly communicate a higher overall project cost compared to a simpler, more streamlined design. This allows potential pool owners to set a preliminary budget range and align their design aspirations with financial realities. Yet, the initial budgetary overview must be regarded with caution, as true cost estimation necessitates detailed material lists and professional assessments.
-
Conceptual Layout and Spatial Planning
Documents depicting pool layouts within a given property help homeowners understand the spatial impact. A blueprint showing appropriate distances from property lines, house foundations, and utility easements assists in visualizing the overall spatial arrangement. A homeowner considering a large pool may use the schematics to determine if the pool encroaches upon setback requirements or other spatial limitations. This spatial mapping is essential for evaluating the project’s overall feasibility before investing in more detailed design plans. But again, spatial planning must be validated by professional surveyors and local ordinance experts.
In summary, readily available construction plans represent a potent tool for preliminary design concepts. While offering inspiration and a basic understanding of design possibilities, it is crucial to recognize their inherent limitations. These schematics serve as a starting point, a canvas for ideas, but the final design must be rigorously adapted and validated by qualified professionals to ensure structural integrity, regulatory compliance, and accurate cost estimation.
2. Accessibility, Not Completeness
The tale of the readily available construction plan often begins with hope, a homeowner envisioning cool waters shimmering in the sunlit expanse of their backyard. Such a resource, obtained without charge, grants immediate entry to a world of design possibilities. This easy access, however, masks a critical truth: the plans are inherently incomplete. The story of Mr. Henderson exemplifies this. He discovered what appeared to be a comprehensive in-ground pool construction plan online. Lured by the promise of saving thousands on design fees, he eagerly commenced the project. The initial excavation seemed straightforward, mirroring the blueprint’s specifications. However, he soon encountered unexpected subsurface rock formations, absent from the readily accessed plan. The “free” blueprint lacked the detailed geological survey necessary for his specific location, resulting in significant cost overruns and construction delays. The allure of the accessible quickly faded, replaced by the sobering realization of its incompleteness.
This incompleteness extends beyond geological considerations. These plans rarely incorporate local building codes, setback regulations, or specific engineering calculations tailored to individual property conditions. A document acquired online might detail the ideal rebar configuration for a pool structure, yet fail to account for the seismic activity prevalent in the region where the pool is being built. Or, a standard filtration system outlined may be inappropriate for water hardness or local water quality considerations. The practical implication is profound: reliance on such incomplete documents without expert oversight can lead to structural vulnerabilities, code violations, and ultimately, costly remediation. The dream of a backyard oasis quickly turns into a legal and structural nightmare. The initial cost “savings” are dwarfed by the expenses needed to rectify the plan’s omissions.
Therefore, the understanding that readily available construction plans are characterized by “accessibility, not completeness” is paramount. Their value resides in their ability to stimulate initial design exploration, but they must be treated as starting points, not definitive guides. The challenge lies in recognizing the inherent limitations of these accessible resources and supplementing them with the expertise of qualified professionals. Ignoring this crucial caveat transforms a potential cost-saving measure into a recipe for structural instability, regulatory entanglement, and ultimately, financial ruin. The accessible blueprint serves as a gateway, but the path to a structurally sound and legally compliant swimming pool requires far more than simply unlocking the gate.
3. Site-Specific Adjustments
The siren song of a no-cost construction plan for a private swimming pool can often drown out the critical need for site-specific tailoring. What looks promising on a digital screen often clashes violently with the unforgiving reality of a backyard’s unique characteristics. These readily available documents, in their generalized form, represent an idealized scenario, rarely mirroring the nuanced complexities of individual properties.
-
Topography and Grading
Consider the tale of two neighbors, Mrs. Davison and Mr. Elmsworth, both armed with the same downloadable pool blueprint. Mrs. Davisons yard was a flat, predictable expanse, allowing for relatively straightforward excavation. Mr. Elmsworth, however, faced a dramatic slope. The generic blueprint offered no guidance on retaining wall requirements, soil stabilization, or the altered drainage patterns that would inevitably result from leveling the pool area. He dismissed the need for a professional survey, clinging to the simplicity of the “free” plan. The resulting landslide, damaging his property and his neighbor’s, served as a stark lesson: ignoring topography rendered the initial schematic worse than useless.
-
Soil Composition and Stability
The composition of the ground beneath one’s feet is rarely considered when downloading a “free” schematic. Imagine a blueprint calling for a standard concrete foundation. Now envision that foundation resting upon expansive clay soil, prone to significant volume changes with variations in moisture content. What the plan failed to address, and what a geotechnical engineer would have immediately identified, was the need for deep foundation piers to prevent catastrophic cracking and shifting. The “free” blueprint, silent on this crucial aspect, becomes an invitation to structural failure. A house in Tampa, Florida was constructed using only free blue prints. Ignoring soil testing caused that the foundation was cracked within one year.
-
Utility Easements and Setback Requirements
A blueprint, however elegantly rendered, exists in a legal vacuum. It cannot account for the intricate web of utility easements that might crisscross a seemingly open backyard. A homeowner, relying solely on such a document, might blissfully plan a pool directly over a high-pressure gas line or within a designated setback area. The rude awakening comes in the form of a cease-and-desist order from the local municipality, followed by the expensive and disheartening task of relocating the entire pool. The seemingly simple act of downloading a document morphs into a legal and logistical nightmare.
-
Environmental Considerations and Drainage
Even the most meticulously crafted readily available plan cannot foresee the environmental sensitivities of a particular location. Consider a wetland area adjacent to a property, an area easily overlooked by the untrained eye. Excavating for a pool without proper drainage considerations could lead to the unintended redirection of water flow, damaging the delicate ecosystem and potentially incurring significant fines from environmental regulatory agencies. The “free” plan, devoid of such site-specific assessments, becomes a catalyst for ecological damage and legal repercussions.
These stories, born from the intersection of aspiration and readily available schematics, underscore a fundamental truth: construction plans, obtained at no cost, represent a generalized starting point, not a definitive solution. The absence of site-specific adjustments transforms them from a potential cost-saving tool into a source of significant financial and legal peril. The unique contours, composition, and legal landscape of each property demand careful consideration and professional adaptation, rendering the initial “free” blueprint merely a faint whisper in the face of tangible reality.
4. Structural Integrity Concerns
The allure of complimentary construction plans for aquatic recreation spaces can often obscure a crucial element: the structural soundness of the finished product. The perceived savings associated with these readily available blueprints frequently eclipse the potentially devastating consequences of compromised structural integrity. The following points illuminate the critical connection between these resources and the inherent risks to long-term stability and safety.
-
Foundation Design and Soil Load Calculations
Mrs. Petrov, armed with a no-cost design for an in-ground pool, overlooked the importance of soil load calculations specific to her region. The readily available blueprint specified a standard foundation depth, failing to account for the expansive clay soil common in her locality. Over time, the pool shell began to crack and shift due to inadequate foundation support. The resulting repairs not only exceeded the initial estimated cost of a professionally engineered design but also posed a safety hazard. The “free” blueprint, devoid of site-specific foundation analysis, became a liability rather than an asset.
-
Reinforcement and Material Specifications
The tragedy of the Miller family serves as a somber reminder of the dangers of inadequate reinforcement. A readily available schematic detailed rebar placement and concrete thickness. However, the plan omitted crucial information regarding the specific grade of steel required to withstand hydrostatic pressure. A seemingly minor omission led to catastrophic failure when the pool walls buckled under pressure, causing significant damage to the surrounding landscape and narrowly avoiding serious injury. The readily available document, lacking comprehensive material specifications, became a harbinger of structural collapse.
-
Hydrostatic Pressure Management
Many readily available plans fail to adequately address hydrostatic pressure, the force exerted by groundwater on the pool structure. In regions with high water tables, neglecting proper drainage and pressure relief mechanisms can lead to significant structural damage. A community pool project was undertaken using a construction plan obtained without cost. The blueprint did not specify the need for a hydrostatic relief valve or an under-drain system. After a particularly heavy rainfall, the pool floor heaved upward, rendering the pool unusable and necessitating extensive repairs. The savings from the “free” plan were quickly consumed by the exorbitant cost of rectifying the structural oversight.
-
Compliance with Seismic Standards
In seismically active regions, adhering to specific earthquake-resistant design principles is paramount. Readily available blueprints, created without consideration for local seismic codes, can prove disastrous. Imagine a pool constructed using a generic design in California. During a moderate earthquake, the pool walls cracked due to inadequate shear reinforcement. The resulting leakage caused soil erosion, undermining the foundation of a nearby house. The initial appeal of a readily available blueprint paled in comparison to the extensive damage and potential legal ramifications resulting from non-compliance with seismic standards.
These anecdotes, each stemming from reliance on readily available construction plans, illustrate a consistent theme: compromised structural integrity resulting from inadequate design and construction practices. While the allure of cost savings is undeniable, the potential consequences of structural failure far outweigh any perceived financial benefits. The readily available schematic represents a starting point, not a substitute for professional engineering expertise. Prioritizing structural integrity, through meticulous design and adherence to local building codes, is essential for ensuring the long-term safety and stability of any swimming pool project.
5. Material Cost Estimation
The deceptive allure of the no-cost blueprint frequently leads homeowners into a financial quagmire, specifically concerning material expenses. The readily available schematic, often promising significant savings, rarely provides an accurate or comprehensive assessment of material requirements and their associated costs. A story illustrates this perfectly: Mr. and Mrs. Gable, inspired by a website advertising backyard renovations, downloaded a blueprint for a seemingly simple rectangular pool. The document listed general material categories concrete, rebar, tiles, plumbing but omitted crucial details. For instance, the concrete quantity was expressed in cubic yards, without specifying the required PSI rating, which dramatically impacts the cost. The rebar was listed by weight, but not by grade, which dictates tensile strength and price. The tile was described simply as “pool tile,” ignoring the vast spectrum of materials, ranging from inexpensive ceramic to high-end glass mosaics. The Gable’s, emboldened by the “free” blueprint, began purchasing materials based on the vague list. The cost quickly spiraled out of control. They discovered that the “pool tile” they had chosen was far more expensive than anticipated, the required concrete grade was higher, and the plumbing fixtures needed to comply with updated local regulations, adding significantly to the initial projections. The readily available blueprint, intended to save money, instead became a roadmap to financial overspending.
The problem lies not only in the lack of specificity but also in the exclusion of ancillary materials. A typical no-cost plan focuses on the core components of the pool shell, often overlooking essential items such as excavation equipment rental, backfill materials, chemical startup kits, safety fencing, and coping stones. These seemingly minor expenses can collectively add up to a substantial portion of the overall project budget. Furthermore, readily available documents rarely account for material waste. A professional contractor typically factors in a percentage of waste for cutting, breakage, and unforeseen circumstances. The Gable’s, lacking this expertise, underestimated their material needs, leading to multiple trips to the hardware store and further cost overruns. The time spent on these unplanned shopping trips further eroded their initial savings.
In conclusion, while the readily available swimming pool blueprint offers the illusion of cost control, its inadequacy in material cost estimation often proves to be a significant pitfall. The absence of specific material grades, quantities, and consideration for ancillary expenses can lead to dramatic budget overruns. The “free” plan, intended to simplify the process, becomes a source of financial frustration. Homeowners must recognize that a professional material take-off, tailored to their specific design and local market conditions, is essential for accurate cost forecasting, and is a valuable counter measure to the vagueness of these readily obtained resources. Otherwise the dream of a backyard oasis quickly turns to a financial burden.
6. Permit Requirements
The pursuit of a backyard swimming pool, often initiated with the allure of readily accessible, complimentary blueprints, quickly encounters the formidable hurdle of permit requirements. These regulations, dictated by local municipalities and governing bodies, represent a critical, often overlooked, aspect of pool construction. The ease with which one can download a schematic belies the complexities involved in obtaining the necessary approvals to transform that digital design into a tangible reality.
-
Zoning Regulations and Setback Restrictions
Mrs. Hawthorne, a retiree eager to enhance her property, downloaded a visually appealing blueprint for a kidney-shaped pool. The document showcased an idyllic design, neglecting the critical issue of zoning regulations. Mrs. Hawthorne, unaware of the required setback distances from property lines, proceeded with excavation based solely on the readily obtained blueprint. The municipality, upon inspection, issued a stop-work order. The pool’s proximity to the property line violated zoning laws, necessitating costly redesign and relocation. The “free” blueprint had failed to account for the foundational element of spatial compliance, turning Mrs. Hawthorne’s dream into a bureaucratic nightmare.
-
Building Codes and Safety Standards
A community association, seeking to upgrade their recreational facilities, opted for a cost-effective solution: a readily available blueprint for a new pool complex. The schematic, though visually appealing, neglected the intricacies of local building codes. The association, unaware of the specific requirements for pool fencing, safety barriers, and accessibility features, commenced construction. The resulting inspection revealed numerous code violations, necessitating extensive modifications and substantial financial penalties. The readily obtained plan, lacking adherence to safety standards, jeopardized the project’s viability and exposed the association to potential legal liabilities.
-
Environmental Impact Assessments
Mr. Jensen, an environmentally conscious homeowner, downloaded a blueprint for a natural swimming pool, a design that purported to integrate seamlessly with the surrounding ecosystem. The plan, however, failed to address the critical need for an environmental impact assessment. The excavation process disrupted local drainage patterns, leading to soil erosion and water contamination. The environmental regulatory agency intervened, imposing hefty fines and mandating costly remediation measures. The “free” blueprint, devoid of environmental considerations, transformed Mr. Jensen’s dream of ecological harmony into a costly environmental transgression.
-
Electrical and Plumbing Compliance
A homeowner in Scottsdale, Arizona, decided to install a spa using a freely available online blueprint to lower installation costs. The electrical and plumbing requirements in Scottsdale differ quite substantially from other municipalities. This blueprint was too generic and had no specific electrical and plumbing requirements which caused many additional costs on his end.
These narratives, each stemming from the allure of readily accessible blueprints, underscore a fundamental truth: permit requirements represent a critical, non-negotiable aspect of swimming pool construction. The ease with which one can download a document often overshadows the complex regulatory landscape that governs its implementation. Zoning regulations, building codes, environmental impact assessments, and adherence to safety standards are essential considerations that cannot be ignored. The readily available blueprint serves as a starting point, a spark of inspiration, but it must be supplemented by thorough research and professional consultation to ensure compliance with all applicable permit requirements. Failure to do so transforms the promise of a backyard oasis into a quagmire of bureaucratic delays, financial penalties, and potential legal liabilities.
7. Professional Consultation Needed
The siren song of a “free swimming pool blueprint” often lulls prospective pool owners into a false sense of self-sufficiency, obscuring the critical necessity of professional consultation. These readily available schematics, while offering an initial glimpse into design possibilities, represent only the first, and arguably least complex, step in a multifaceted construction process. The absence of expert guidance transforms what appears to be a cost-saving measure into a potential source of structural instability, regulatory entanglement, and significant financial risk.
Consider the case of the Thompson family. Armed with a downloaded blueprint for a modern rectangular pool, they embarked on a DIY project, confident in their ability to follow the provided instructions. The schematic, however, lacked crucial details regarding soil composition and drainage requirements specific to their property. Ignoring this critical oversight, they proceeded with excavation. The first heavy rain exposed the flaw: the pool site flooded, destabilizing the surrounding soil and threatening the integrity of their home’s foundation. A professional engineer, summoned to assess the damage, determined that the readily available blueprint was wholly inadequate for their site conditions, necessitating extensive and costly remediation measures. The Thompsons’ initial attempt to save money ultimately resulted in significant financial loss and a protracted construction delay. Their story serves as a cautionary tale, highlighting the profound difference between a general schematic and a professionally tailored design.
The connection between readily available construction plans and the imperative need for expert consultation is not merely advisory; it is a fundamental requirement for ensuring a safe, structurally sound, and legally compliant outcome. The apparent simplicity of these “free” documents masks a complex web of engineering principles, regulatory codes, and site-specific considerations that demand the expertise of qualified professionals. Ignoring this connection transforms the dream of a backyard oasis into a potential nightmare of structural failure, legal entanglement, and financial burden.
Frequently Asked Questions Regarding No-Cost Swimming Pool Schematics
The allure of readily available construction plans for a backyard swimming pool prompts numerous inquiries. The following addresses common concerns and misconceptions arising from the pursuit of these resources. The following represent frequently encountered scenarios, providing clarity on the complexities involved.
Question 1: Are readily available swimming pool construction plans truly “free,” or are there hidden costs involved?
The term “free” can be misleading. While the initial schematic may be obtained without direct payment, the true cost lies in potential oversights. A family in rural Oregon believed they had struck gold with a no-cost plan, only to discover that the generic design failed to account for the region’s unique soil conditions. The resulting structural damage required extensive repairs, far exceeding the cost of a professionally engineered design. The “free” plan, in essence, became quite expensive.
Question 2: Can a homeowner with limited construction experience successfully build a pool using only readily available construction plans?
This is ill-advised. Mr. Henderson, a seasoned carpenter, attempted to construct his pool using a downloadable schematic. He underestimated the complexities of plumbing and electrical systems, leading to code violations and requiring the costly services of licensed professionals to rectify his errors. Experience in carpentry does not automatically translate to expertise in all facets of pool construction.
Question 3: Do readily available construction plans typically comply with local building codes and regulations?
Rarely. A community association in Florida decided to use a free plan to save on consultant fees. The schematic failed to meet the state’s stringent safety requirements for pool fencing, resulting in a delayed opening and significant fines. Compliance with local codes is a critical aspect often overlooked in generic blueprints.
Question 4: How can a homeowner ensure the structural integrity of a pool built using a readily available construction plan?
Structural integrity cannot be guaranteed without professional engineering oversight. The Martinez family in California, armed with a no-cost schematic, failed to account for seismic activity in their region. An earthquake caused severe cracking in their pool shell, necessitating extensive repairs. Site-specific engineering analysis is essential for mitigating structural risks.
Question 5: Are material lists provided in readily available construction plans accurate and comprehensive?
Often, material lists are incomplete and lack specificity. A homeowner in Texas discovered that the material list provided in his “free” blueprint omitted crucial items such as drainage pipes and sealant, leading to unexpected expenses and project delays. Comprehensive material lists are rarely found in readily available plans.
Question 6: What are the potential legal liabilities associated with building a pool using only readily available construction plans?
Legal liabilities can be substantial. A property owner in Arizona constructed a pool using a no-cost plan, unaware that the design violated a utility easement. The utility company sued, forcing the homeowner to relocate the pool at significant expense. Legal compliance is a critical consideration often absent in generic blueprints.
In summary, readily available construction plans for swimming pools should be regarded as preliminary resources, not definitive guides. The allure of cost savings must be tempered by the recognition that professional expertise is essential for ensuring safety, compliance, and structural integrity. The experiences detailed above serve as cautionary tales, underscoring the potential pitfalls of relying solely on these resources.
The subsequent section will provide guidance on identifying reliable sources for swimming pool design and construction, emphasizing the importance of selecting qualified professionals.
Navigating the Labyrinth
The pursuit of a backyard oasis often begins with the promise of freely accessible schematics, a digital doorway to aquatic dreams. However, prudence dictates a measured approach. The following points, gleaned from the experiences of others, serve as guiding principles when considering these resources.
Tip 1: Recognize the “Free” Aspect’s Limitations
A document obtained at no cost rarely encompasses the full spectrum of project requirements. The story of the Peterson family serves as a reminder. Enticed by a complimentary design, they neglected soil testing. The resulting foundation cracks cost them significantly more than a professional assessment would have. Therefore, view the readily available blueprint as a starting point, not a comprehensive solution.
Tip 2: Prioritize Site-Specific Adaptations
A generic plan cannot account for unique geographical characteristics. Mr. Abernathy, armed with a downloaded schematic, overlooked the sloping grade of his property. The subsequent erosion and drainage issues necessitated costly retaining walls. A professional site survey is crucial to ensure the plan aligns with reality.
Tip 3: Scrutinize Material Specifications with Diligence
Vague material lists are a common pitfall. The Ramirez family discovered that the “pool tile” specified in their blueprint encompassed a wide range of prices and qualities. The resulting budget overruns forced them to scale back their design. Precise material specifications are essential for accurate cost estimation.
Tip 4: Research Local Regulations with Exquisite Care
Ignoring permit requirements can lead to significant setbacks. The Johnson’s, enthralled by their readily available design, failed to research setback restrictions. The municipality ordered them to relocate their partially constructed pool, incurring substantial expenses. Thorough regulatory research is paramount.
Tip 5: Seek Professional Validation Before Excavation Commences
Expert consultation is not optional; it is a necessity. The Garcia’s, confident in their DIY skills, began excavation without consulting an engineer. The discovery of a high-pressure gas line forced them to halt construction and incur significant relocation costs. Professional validation mitigates unforeseen risks.
Tip 6: Acknowledge the Trade-Off Between Cost and Risk
The pursuit of cost savings should not compromise safety or structural integrity. The Smith family, seeking to minimize expenses, opted for a readily available plan that lacked seismic reinforcement. A minor earthquake caused significant damage to their pool, jeopardizing the stability of their home. Risk assessment is an integral component of sound planning.
Tip 7: Understand that “Free” Often Translates to “Incomplete”
The allure of no-cost schematics often overshadows the inherent limitations of these resources. The Jones family only discovered after installation that an essential hydrostatic valve had been excluded, leading to a cracked pool shell. A readiness to address potential oversights is therefore critical.
These points underscore a central theme: caution and diligence are paramount when navigating the realm of readily available blueprints. These resources can serve as a springboard for inspiration, but never as a substitute for professional expertise.
The upcoming section will delve into the essential components of a professionally engineered swimming pool design, emphasizing the value of investing in expert guidance.
The Murky Depths of “Free Swimming Pool Blueprints”
This exploration into the realm of readily available construction plans for private swimming pools has revealed a consistent narrative: the allure of a no-cost schematic often obscures a far more complex reality. The tales of homeowners, armed with downloaded documents and fueled by the promise of savings, consistently devolve into cautionary narratives of structural failures, regulatory entanglements, and unanticipated financial burdens. The keyword, “free swimming pool blueprints”, initially whispered as a siren song of affordability, often crescendos into a deafening chorus of unforeseen challenges.
The lesson gleaned from these accounts is stark: while the digital age offers unprecedented access to information, the creation of a safe, compliant, and structurally sound swimming pool demands more than just readily available schematics. The path to a backyard oasis is not paved with freely accessible plans, but rather with meticulous planning, expert guidance, and a clear understanding of the inherent risks involved. Proceed with caution, for the true cost of a swimming pool extends far beyond the initial price of a blueprint.
