A sum of money paid upfront at the beginning of a car lease agreement is generally not refundable at the lease’s conclusion. This initial payment, often referred to as capitalized cost reduction, lowers the monthly payment throughout the lease term. For instance, an individual might provide several thousand dollars upfront to reduce their monthly lease expense by a specified amount.
The advantage of providing an initial payment lies in the potential for lower monthly payments during the lease period. This can be particularly beneficial for individuals on a budget or those seeking to minimize their monthly financial obligations. Historically, this practice has allowed more people to access vehicle leasing arrangements, making it a common strategy within the automotive industry.
Understanding the non-refundable nature of this initial lease payment is critical before entering into a lease agreement. Further discussion will explore alternative strategies for managing lease costs and the factors to consider when deciding whether to make an upfront payment.
1. Non-refundable
The term “non-refundable” carries significant weight within the realm of vehicle leasing. It represents a fixed commitment, a financial decision with enduring consequences, particularly in the context of initial payments made towards a car lease. This characteristic fundamentally shapes the lessee’s financial strategy and risk assessment throughout the lease term.
-
Lost Opportunity Cost
An initial lease payment, once made, cannot be reclaimed regardless of the lessee’s evolving circumstances. That sum represents an opportunity cost, funds that could have been allocated to alternative investments or savings. For instance, an individual who provides a $3,000 down payment at the start of a lease forfeits the potential returns that amount might have generated in a diversified investment portfolio. This highlights the need to weigh the immediate benefit of lower monthly payments against the long-term potential of other financial avenues.
-
Impact of Early Termination
Early lease termination accentuates the “non-refundable” aspect. Should a lessee choose to end the lease prematurely due to unforeseen circumstances such as relocation or financial hardship, the initial payment remains with the leasing company. The lessee will likely face additional penalties, further compounding the financial burden. This emphasizes the importance of carefully considering the lease term and anticipating potential life changes before committing to an initial payment.
-
Insurance in Total Loss Scenarios
While not directly refundable, insurance coverage in the event of a total loss may indirectly address the upfront payment. Gap insurance, for example, covers the difference between the vehicle’s actual cash value and the remaining lease balance. Although the upfront payment isn’t returned, gap insurance can prevent owing a substantial sum if the vehicle is totaled early in the lease, essentially mitigating a significant loss that would otherwise magnify the initial payment’s impact.
-
Psychological Ownership and Loss Aversion
The understanding that the initial payment is non-refundable can influence a lessee’s perception of ownership and their susceptibility to loss aversion. Because the lessee cannot recoup the down payment, the vehicle may feel more like a sunk cost, affecting decisions related to its care and maintenance. Loss aversion, the tendency to prefer avoiding losses to acquiring equivalent gains, can lead lessees to be more cautious with the vehicle in an attempt to safeguard the investment made upfront.
In conclusion, the “non-refundable” nature of an initial lease payment is a central consideration for any prospective lessee. It underscores the need for meticulous financial planning, comprehensive risk assessment, and a clear understanding of the lease terms. While an upfront payment can reduce monthly expenses, its irrevocability demands careful deliberation of alternative investment opportunities and potential future scenarios.
2. Reduces monthly payments
The allure of lower monthly payments frequently drives the decision to make an upfront payment on a vehicle lease. This reduction stems from the direct influence the upfront sum exerts on the vehicle’s capitalized cost. By decreasing the initial amount financed, the subsequent monthly installments are correspondingly lower. An individual might find themselves choosing between a $0 down payment with a $400 monthly payment or a $3,000 upfront sum that reduces the monthly outlay to $300. The promise of consistent, smaller payments can be particularly attractive to those with tight budgetary constraints or those seeking to manage cash flow effectively.
However, this advantage comes with a crucial caveat: the initial payment is generally non-refundable. Once the lease agreement is executed, this money is committed, regardless of whether the lessee completes the full lease term. Consider the scenario of a recent graduate entering into a three-year lease, motivated by the reduced monthly expense afforded by an upfront payment. If, within a year, a job relocation necessitates terminating the lease, the graduate will likely forfeit the initial investment, along with potentially incurring additional penalties. This underscores the need to weigh the immediate benefit of reduced monthly payments against the long-term risk associated with the upfront payment’s non-refundable nature.
The connection between reduced monthly payments and the non-refundable nature of the initial investment defines the essence of the leasing decision. It forces a careful evaluation of financial priorities and potential future uncertainties. While the prospect of smaller monthly expenses is undeniably appealing, a comprehensive understanding of the upfront payment’s implications is essential for responsible financial planning. This balance must be struck to ensure the long-term benefits outweigh the inherent risks of the vehicle leasing agreement.
3. Capitalized cost reduction
The concept of capitalized cost reduction in vehicle leasing stands as a pivotal element, directly influencing the lessee’s financial commitment. It intertwines inextricably with the question of whether an initial payment is recoverable at the lease’s end. The answer, invariably, is no, but the narrative woven around this financial mechanism warrants deeper exploration.
-
The Illusion of Equity
A capitalized cost reduction, achieved through an upfront payment, creates the illusion of building equity in the leased vehicle. In reality, this reduction simply lowers the base upon which monthly payments are calculated. Consider a scenario where an individual leases a car with a capitalized cost of $30,000. A $3,000 upfront payment reduces this cost to $27,000. While the monthly payments decrease, this $3,000 does not represent ownership or future claim on the vehicle’s value. It’s a cost incurred for the benefit of reduced monthly obligations, a sunk cost in the leasing equation.
-
The Dealer’s Perspective
For a dealership, the capitalized cost reduction offers a strategic advantage. It allows them to present a more appealing monthly payment figure, often swaying potential lessees who focus primarily on this number. The dealership benefits from the upfront cash injection, improving their cash flow position. This upfront payment also somewhat de-risks the lease for the lending institution, as a portion of the vehicle’s depreciation is covered at the outset. It’s a calculated move that enhances both the dealership’s profitability and the perceived affordability for the consumer.
-
Risk Mitigation vs. Reward Potential
The decision to apply a capitalized cost reduction involves a trade-off between risk mitigation and reward potential. By making an upfront payment, the lessee reduces the risk of high monthly payments, particularly if unforeseen financial circumstances arise. However, this risk mitigation comes at the expense of potentially greater rewards. Had the funds been invested elsewhere, they might have yielded a return exceeding the savings achieved through reduced monthly lease payments. This emphasizes the importance of evaluating individual financial circumstances and considering alternative investment opportunities before committing to a substantial upfront payment.
-
The Impact on Lease-End Options
The capitalized cost reduction has minimal impact on lease-end options. Whether the lessee chooses to purchase the vehicle at the end of the lease or return it, the initial payment remains irretrievable. The buyout price is determined by the vehicle’s residual value, a figure predetermined at the start of the lease and independent of the capitalized cost reduction. This reinforces the notion that the upfront payment is solely intended to lower monthly installments, not to contribute towards future ownership or provide leverage during lease-end negotiations.
The intricacies of capitalized cost reduction underscore a fundamental truth in vehicle leasing: upfront payments are a cost, not an investment. They serve to lower monthly payments but do not create equity, provide returns, or influence lease-end outcomes. The decision to make such a payment must be carefully considered, weighing the benefits against the potential for alternative financial strategies. The phrase “do you get back down payment car lease” serves as a stark reminder of this financial reality, urging lessees to approach leasing with informed awareness.
4. Lower overall cost?
The assertion that an initial payment towards a vehicle lease translates into a lower overall cost is a common misconception, often obscuring the financial realities beneath the surface. The core question, do you get back down payment car lease, reveals the flaw in this assumption. A young couple, eager to secure a new SUV for their growing family, was presented with two leasing options: a $0 down payment with a higher monthly fee, or a $4,000 upfront payment substantially reducing the monthly outlay. Blinded by the allure of smaller monthly expenses, they opted for the latter, believing they were saving money. This decision, however, failed to account for the fundamental characteristic of lease agreements: the upfront payment is non-refundable. Should circumstances change, rendering the lease unsustainable, that $4,000 vanishes, transforming the perceived savings into a tangible loss. The lower monthly payments are merely an exchange; funds are paid in advance instead of incrementally, but the aggregate cost may, in certain scenarios, increase rather than decrease.
A careful analysis comparing the total cost of the lease with and without the initial payment is crucial. This includes factoring in potential early termination fees, wear-and-tear charges, and mileage overages. In the aforementioned scenario, the couple’s financial situation shifted unexpectedly due to a job loss. Forced to terminate the lease prematurely, they not only forfeited their $4,000 upfront payment but also incurred significant termination penalties. A comprehensive cost comparison, incorporating these potential liabilities, often reveals that the lower overall cost achieved through the initial payment is an illusion, especially when considering opportunity cost. The funds used for the down payment could potentially generate returns if invested elsewhere, further widening the gap between perceived and actual savings.
The pursuit of a “lower overall cost” in vehicle leasing demands a nuanced understanding of all associated expenses and potential contingencies. The initial payment is not a deposit securing ownership or future value, but a non-refundable reduction of monthly installments. Lessees must meticulously calculate the total projected cost under various scenarios, including early termination, and compare it against alternative options. Only through this rigorous evaluation can one determine whether the perceived savings associated with the initial payment are genuine, or merely a financial mirage. The question “do you get back down payment car lease” serves as a stark reminder that upfront payments are a one-way street, demanding careful consideration before commitment.
5. Equity not created
The phrase “Equity not created” is the silent counterpoint to the tempting promise of low monthly payments in a vehicle lease. It stands as a stark financial reality directly linked to the fundamental question: do you get back down payment car lease? The answer, unequivocally, is no. To understand why requires delving into the core nature of leasing and its distinct difference from vehicle ownership.
-
The Illusion of Ownership
An initial payment, often substantial, can create the illusion of ownership or part-ownership in the vehicle. A young professional, accustomed to purchasing assets, makes a significant down payment on a leased sedan, feeling a sense of investment and control. However, unlike a traditional car loan where each payment slowly builds equity, the lease payment, including the initial sum, merely purchases the right to use the vehicle for a specified period. The car remains the property of the leasing company, and the initial payment secures only the temporary access.
-
Depreciation’s Dominance
In a lease agreement, the primary expense is the vehicle’s depreciation over the lease term. The initial payment does not offset this depreciation; it simply reduces the amount financed and, consequently, the monthly payments. An older couple, seeking a luxury vehicle, makes a large down payment believing it will significantly reduce their financial exposure. However, the bulk of their lease cost is determined by the difference between the vehicle’s initial value and its projected residual value at lease-end. The down payment, while lowering monthly installments, doesn’t alter the depreciation’s impact and provides no ownership stake when the lease concludes.
-
The Lost Opportunity
Because leasing doesn’t create equity, the funds used for the initial payment represent a lost opportunity cost. The down payment could have been invested, saved, or used to pay down other debts. A small business owner, seeking a company vehicle, pours a significant portion of available capital into an initial lease payment. The lower monthly payments are appealing, but the business forgoes the potential returns that capital could have generated if invested in business development or other revenue-generating activities. The “Equity not created” aspect highlights the need to consider alternative uses for the funds before committing to a lease.
-
Lease-End Realities
The lack of equity becomes most apparent at the end of the lease. Unlike a loan where the final payment signifies ownership, a lease concludes with the vehicle’s return. The initial payment is not refunded or credited toward a purchase. A family, enjoying their leased minivan, reaches the end of the lease term. They have made consistent monthly payments and maintained the vehicle meticulously. Yet, they have no ownership claim. To acquire the vehicle, they must pay the pre-determined residual value, a cost independent of the initial down payment. The “Equity not created” principle reinforces the distinction between leasing and purchasing, clarifying that leasing is a form of long-term rental rather than asset acquisition.
The connection between “Equity not created” and the unrecoverable nature of the initial payment in a car lease underscores a crucial financial lesson. Leasing provides access to a vehicle for a defined period in exchange for payments. These payments, including any upfront sum, do not build ownership or future claim on the vehicle’s value. Understanding this distinction is paramount for making informed decisions about vehicle acquisition and managing personal or business finances effectively.
6. Alternative investments
The question, do you get back down payment car lease, resonates deeply when juxtaposed with the concept of alternative investments. An aspiring entrepreneur, envisioning a bustling food truck business, faced a pivotal decision: divert a significant sum towards a down payment on a leased vehicle or allocate those funds towards essential kitchen equipment. The leased vehicle offered immediate mobility, crucial for catering events and reaching diverse clientele. However, the non-refundable nature of the down payment weighed heavily. It represented capital locked away, unable to generate returns or fuel business growth. The alternative investment, the kitchen equipment, promised a tangible return through increased production capacity and higher-quality offerings. Choosing between these two options demanded a careful evaluation of potential financial outcomes, recognizing that the forfeited down payment could represent a substantial missed opportunity.
The crucial connection lies in opportunity cost. Every dollar committed to a non-refundable down payment on a car lease is a dollar unavailable for alternative investments that could appreciate in value or generate income. Consider a recent college graduate with student loan debt. A tempting offer for a leased vehicle with a low monthly payment, enabled by a substantial down payment, might seem appealing. However, allocating those funds towards reducing the principal on the student loans could save thousands of dollars in interest over the loan’s lifetime, far exceeding any perceived savings from the reduced lease payments. This decision underscores the importance of assessing individual financial priorities and considering the long-term implications of foregoing potentially more lucrative investment opportunities. The alternative investment, debt reduction, offers a tangible return and builds long-term financial stability, a stark contrast to the irrecoverable nature of a lease down payment.
In conclusion, the understanding of alternative investments fundamentally shapes the decision-making process concerning vehicle leasing. Recognizing that a down payment is a sunk cost, unavailable for more productive uses, demands a rigorous evaluation of individual financial circumstances and goals. Whether it’s investing in stocks, bonds, real estate, or even personal development through education, the potential returns from these alternative avenues must be weighed against the perceived benefits of lower monthly lease payments. The question of whether one recovers the down payment on a car lease serves as a powerful reminder of the opportunity cost involved, urging individuals to make informed decisions that align with their broader financial objectives. The true cost of a lease extends beyond the monthly payment, encompassing the foregone potential of alternative investments.
7. Negotiation importance
The unrecoverable nature of a down payment on a car lease amplifies the significance of skillful negotiation. Once the agreement is signed, the funds are committed, leaving little recourse for retrieval. Therefore, the pre-lease negotiation phase becomes paramount, a strategic battlefield where financial outcomes are determined. A seasoned accountant, known for his meticulous approach to financial matters, understood this implicitly.
-
Mitigating the Down Payment
The primary objective in lease negotiation should be minimizing, or even eliminating, the down payment altogether. The accountant, entering a dealership seeking a practical family sedan, presented a compelling case for a zero-down lease. He highlighted his excellent credit score, his history of responsible financial management, and his willingness to accept a slightly higher monthly payment in exchange for retaining control of his capital. His negotiation prowess resulted in a lease agreement that eliminated the down payment, preserving his financial flexibility and mitigating the risk of irreversible loss. This illustrates that strong negotiation can often circumvent the need for a substantial upfront investment.
-
Negotiating the Capitalized Cost
Even if a down payment seems unavoidable, skillful negotiation can still reduce its impact. The focus shifts to lowering the capitalized cost of the vehicle. A young lawyer, despite being pressured to make a large down payment on a leased sports car, meticulously researched comparable vehicles and market values. Armed with this data, she challenged the dealership’s initial capitalized cost figure, highlighting discrepancies and presenting evidence of more competitive pricing. Her persistence resulted in a significant reduction in the vehicle’s capitalized cost, effectively diminishing the need for a substantial down payment and minimizing the potential financial hit should circumstances necessitate early termination.
-
Leveraging Lease Incentives
Manufacturers and dealerships often offer lease incentives that can offset or eliminate the need for a down payment. A retired teacher, seeking a fuel-efficient hybrid, diligently researched available incentives and rebates. She discovered a manufacturer-sponsored program offering a substantial cash incentive for leasing certain hybrid models. This incentive, applied directly to the lease agreement, effectively eliminated the need for a down payment, allowing her to secure the vehicle she desired without sacrificing her financial security. Her proactive approach demonstrates the power of research and leveraging available incentives to minimize upfront costs.
-
Understanding Money Factors and Residual Values
Knowledge of the money factor (interest rate) and residual value is crucial in lease negotiation. A financially savvy engineer, understanding these complex parameters, recognized that a seemingly attractive lease offer masked a high money factor and an artificially low residual value. He challenged the dealership to adjust these figures, arguing that they were inflating the overall cost of the lease. His persistence led to a revised lease agreement with a lower money factor and a more realistic residual value, reducing the overall cost of the lease and mitigating the need for a substantial down payment. This illustrates that a deep understanding of lease mechanics can empower individuals to negotiate more favorable terms.
The narrative of these individuals underscores a central theme: While a down payment on a car lease is generally non-refundable, the impact of this financial commitment can be significantly lessened through skillful negotiation. By minimizing the down payment, reducing the capitalized cost, leveraging lease incentives, and understanding lease mechanics, prospective lessees can navigate the negotiation process with greater confidence and secure lease agreements that align with their financial goals. The understanding that “do you get back down payment car lease” is typically answered with “no” heightens the importance of strategic negotiation before committing to a lease agreement.
8. Early lease termination
The question, do you get back down payment car lease, takes on a sharper, more poignant edge when framed against the backdrop of early lease termination. The narrative often unfolds in similar fashion: A young professional, eager to project an image of success, leases a luxury sedan, justifying the sizable down payment as an investment in their future. Circumstances, however, rarely adhere to meticulously crafted plans. An unexpected job loss, a sudden relocation, a family emergency life’s unforeseen upheavals can render the once-desirable lease a burdensome financial obligation. The realization dawns with unsettling clarity: the monthly payments, once manageable, now strain a tightened budget. The only viable option becomes early termination, a decision that brings the initial down payment into stark relief.
The intersection of early termination and the non-refundable down payment is where financial realities collide. The agreement, once perceived as a stepping stone to success, now manifests as a financial trap. The initial payment, made with optimism, becomes a sunk cost, irretrievably lost to the leasing company. In addition to forfeiting the down payment, the lessee typically faces significant penalties for breaking the lease agreement. These penalties can include remaining lease payments, disposition fees, and other charges designed to compensate the leasing company for the vehicle’s diminished value. The financial consequences can be devastating, particularly for those already facing economic hardship. The initial hope of a stylish ride gives way to the harsh lesson that a lease is a binding contract with potentially severe repercussions for early departure. The story of a family forced to relocate due to a career change, and subsequently facing thousands of dollars in penalties in addition to losing their initial lease payment, highlights the very real and often painful consequences of this scenario.
The understanding of early lease termination’s impact on the initial payment serves as a critical cautionary tale. It underscores the need for meticulous financial planning, a thorough assessment of personal stability, and a realistic appraisal of long-term affordability before committing to a car lease. The question of whether the down payment is recoverable during early termination should be top of mind, serving as a constant reminder of the potential financial consequences of unforeseen circumstances. The connection between these two elements early termination and the unrecoverable down payment serves as a stark warning about the commitment leasing entails. It encourages individuals to consider the worst-case scenario before signing on the dotted line, and to explore alternative transportation options that offer greater flexibility and reduced financial risk.
Frequently Asked Questions
Navigating the complexities of vehicle leasing often brings a specific question to the forefront: the fate of the initial payment. The narratives surrounding this element frequently involve individuals grappling with unforeseen circumstances and binding agreements. This FAQ section addresses common concerns regarding the recoverability of this payment, emphasizing the long-term financial implications.
Question 1: Is it generally possible to get back the down payment on a car lease at the end of the lease term?
The harsh reality is that the initial payment made at the beginning of a car lease is almost always non-refundable. Picture a young professional making a sizable down payment to lower monthly costs, only to find, at the lease’s end, that this sum is not returned, nor does it contribute to ownership.
Question 2: Does early termination of a car lease affect the possibility of recovering the initial down payment?
Early lease termination typically results in the forfeiture of the initial down payment. Imagine a family, facing unexpected relocation, forced to terminate their lease. The upfront payment vanishes, compounded by early termination fees, intensifying their financial burden.
Question 3: Can insurance coverage help recover the down payment if the leased car is totaled?
While standard insurance doesn’t directly return the down payment, gap insurance may cover the difference between the car’s value and the remaining lease balance. This can prevent further financial loss but does not recoup the initial payment itself.
Question 4: Are there situations where a dealership might refund a portion of the down payment?
Such instances are rare, usually arising from errors in the lease agreement or deceptive sales practices. Envision a retiree discovering hidden fees in their lease contract. Legal recourse might lead to a settlement, but this is an exception, not the rule.
Question 5: How does the down payment affect the overall cost of the car lease in the long term?
The upfront payment lowers monthly expenses, but it might not reduce the total cost. Picture a couple prioritizing lower monthly payments, unaware that the down payment, combined with interest, could exceed the savings. A careful comparison is paramount.
Question 6: Can negotiating a lower capitalized cost replace the need for a large down payment?
Skillful negotiation can indeed reduce the capitalized cost, potentially eliminating the need for a down payment. Think of a savvy negotiator securing a zero-down lease by demonstrating excellent credit and accepting a slightly higher monthly payment, maintaining financial flexibility.
In summary, the initial payment in a car lease is a significant financial commitment with limited possibilities for recovery. Understanding this reality is vital for informed decision-making.
This exploration of the down payment leads to a crucial consideration: strategies for effectively negotiating lease terms. The next section will delve into techniques that can mitigate financial risk and secure more favorable agreements.
Navigating the Lease Landscape
The question, do you get back down payment car lease, echoes in the minds of countless individuals who’ve grappled with the complexities of vehicle leasing. Their experiences, often tinged with regret and financial strain, provide invaluable lessons for those embarking on this path. Consider their stories, heed their warnings, and arm oneself with knowledge before signing on the dotted line.
Tip 1: The Allure of Zero Down: Reject the temptation to equate a substantial down payment with a better deal. The promise of lower monthly payments often masks the inherent risk. A seasoned financial advisor, witnessing too many clients trapped in unfavorable leases, now advocates for zero-down leases whenever possible. Maintaining control of capital offers greater flexibility and mitigates the potential loss if circumstances change.
Tip 2: Know the Exit Strategy: Before signing the lease agreement, meticulously examine the terms and penalties associated with early termination. A business owner, anticipating growth, leased a fleet of vehicles, only to face unforeseen market disruptions. The exorbitant early termination fees crippled the business, underscoring the importance of factoring in potential downsides before committing.
Tip 3: Question the Add-Ons: Dealerships often entice lessees with additional products and services, such as extended warranties or paint protection, that inflate the capitalized cost. A retired teacher, initially charmed by the promise of a hassle-free ownership experience, later regretted adding these extras, realizing they significantly increased her monthly payments without providing tangible value. Resist the pressure to bundle unnecessary items into the lease agreement.
Tip 4: The Power of Comparison: Never settle for the first offer. Obtain quotes from multiple dealerships and compare lease terms, capitalized costs, and residual values. A young engineer, determined to secure the best possible deal, spent weeks researching and negotiating with different dealerships. His diligence paid off, resulting in a lease agreement with significantly lower monthly payments and more favorable terms.
Tip 5: Beware the Mileage Trap: Underestimating anticipated mileage is a common mistake that can lead to substantial overage charges at the end of the lease. A traveling salesperson, initially lured by a low monthly payment based on a limited mileage allowance, faced thousands of dollars in penalties upon returning the vehicle. Accurately assess driving habits and negotiate for a higher mileage allowance upfront.
Tip 6: The Fine Print Matters: Scrutinize every clause in the lease agreement, paying particular attention to the fine print. A recent graduate, overwhelmed by the lengthy document, overlooked a clause regarding excessive wear and tear. Upon returning the vehicle, he was hit with exorbitant charges for minor scratches and dents, highlighting the importance of carefully reviewing all terms and conditions.
These hard-won lessons underscore a central theme: Leasing requires meticulous planning, informed decision-making, and a healthy dose of skepticism. The question of whether the down payment is recoverable should serve as a constant reminder of the financial commitment involved. Approach leasing with caution, armed with knowledge, and prepared to navigate the complexities of the agreement.
Having explored these practical tips, the article now turns to a discussion of alternative financing options, empowering readers to make informed decisions about vehicle acquisition.
Do You Get Back Down Payment Car Lease
This exploration has navigated the often-murky waters surrounding the initial payment in a car lease, revealing its unwavering truth: it is, in almost all circumstances, irretrievable. From understanding capitalized cost reduction to the harsh realities of early termination, each element emphasizes the financial commitment inherent in this upfront sum. The stories shared, of unforeseen job losses, unexpected relocations, and the simple miscalculations of daily life, paint a stark picture of potential pitfalls.
The lingering question, “do you get back down payment car lease,” serves as a potent reminder of the power of informed decision-making. The responsibility rests squarely on the shoulders of the lessee to weigh the immediate allure of lower monthly payments against the long-term financial implications. May awareness guide future choices, ensuring that financial commitments align with individual circumstances and aspirations, rather than the fleeting appeal of a new car.
