The arrangement of the lug studs on the wheel hub of a 2009 Ford F-150 dictates the compatibility of wheels to the vehicle. Specifically, this measurement, often expressed as a numerical code, indicates the diameter of the circle formed by the lug studs and the number of studs present. For instance, a specification of 6x135mm signifies a six-lug configuration with a bolt circle diameter of 135 millimeters.
Accurate identification of this wheel mounting configuration is critical for several reasons. First, it ensures safe and proper wheel installation, preventing potential wheel detachment during vehicle operation. Second, it broadens the range of aftermarket wheel options available for customization or replacement. Understanding this specification can also prevent costly errors when purchasing new wheels, tires, or related components. Historically, variations in this dimension have existed across different vehicle models and years, emphasizing the importance of verifying compatibility for a specific vehicle like the 2009 F-150.
The subsequent sections will provide detailed information on how to accurately determine this configuration, explore the implications of using incorrect wheel fitments, and offer guidance on selecting compatible wheel and tire combinations for optimal performance and aesthetics of the 2009 Ford F-150.
1. 6x135mm
The tale of the 6x135mm configuration and the 2009 F-150 is one of precise engineering and critical compatibility. It is a story etched in metal, where a deviation of even a millimeter can spell disaster. The 6x135mm designation is not merely a set of numbers; it is the key, the blueprint defining the precise arrangement of the six lug studs on the 2009 F-150’s wheel hub. The “6” signifies the number of studs, while “135mm” denotes the diameter of the circle they form. This precise measurement determines which wheels can be safely and securely mounted on the vehicle. Without adherence to this specification, the forces generated during braking and acceleration become concentrated, potentially leading to sheared studs and catastrophic wheel separation. Consider the case of a small-town mechanic who, relying on outdated information, attempted to fit wheels designed for a different truck. The subtle difference in the mounting interface went unnoticed until a harrowing incident on the highway, narrowly averted. This serves as a stark reminder: the 6x135mm specification is not just a detail; it’s a safety imperative.
The practical significance of understanding this specification extends beyond avoiding dangerous situations. It empowers owners to confidently explore a vast landscape of aftermarket wheel options, knowing that adherence to the 6x135mm standard ensures a seamless and secure fit. This knowledge also streamlines the process of replacing damaged wheels, eliminating the guesswork and potential for costly errors. Furthermore, informed consumers can leverage this understanding when purchasing tires, optimizing for both aesthetics and performance, while maintaining compatibility with the vehicle’s original design parameters. For example, an enthusiast seeking to enhance the off-road capabilities of a 2009 F-150 can select larger tires, knowing that the wheel choice, dictated by the 6x135mm configuration, remains the critical foundation for safe and effective operation.
In essence, the connection between the 6x135mm specification and the 2009 F-150 is unbreakable. It is a crucial element of the vehicle’s structural integrity, a key to unlocking customization potential, and a cornerstone of responsible vehicle ownership. While challenges may arise in correctly identifying this dimension in older or modified vehicles, the potential consequences of error underscore the importance of meticulous verification and adherence to the manufacturer’s specifications. The 6x135mm arrangement is more than just a series of numbers; it is the guardian of safe and reliable wheel mounting on the 2009 Ford F-150.
2. Wheel Compatibility
The juncture between the 2009 F-150’s inherent design and the wheels it accommodates is not arbitrary. It is a marriage forged in the crucible of engineering specifications, where “Wheel Compatibility” hinges directly upon the “2009 f150 bolt pattern.” This compatibility is paramount, dictating not only the vehicle’s aesthetic but, more critically, its safe and reliable operation.
-
Load Rating Adherence
A crucial facet of wheel compatibility centers on the load rating. The 2009 F-150, designed for hauling and towing, demands wheels capable of withstanding significant weight. The load rating, often stamped on the wheel itself, must meet or exceed the vehicle’s Gross Axle Weight Rating (GAWR). A contractor, overloading his F-150 with equipment while using wheels with an insufficient load rating, experienced catastrophic wheel failure, resulting in a costly accident and near-serious injury. This underscores the need to align load ratings with the vehicle’s intended use.
-
Center Bore Matching
The center bore, the hole in the wheel’s center that fits over the hub, plays a critical role. A hub-centric wheel is designed to fit snugly over the hub, transferring the vehicle’s weight directly to the hub, rather than relying solely on the lug nuts. In contrast, a lug-centric wheel uses the lug nuts to center the wheel. While both can work, a mismatched center bore can induce vibrations and premature wear on the lug nuts. A fleet manager, unknowingly fitting wheels with an incorrect center bore, observed recurring issues with lug nut loosening and unusual tire wear across his fleet of F-150s, highlighting the importance of hub compatibility.
-
Offset Considerations
Wheel offset, the distance between the wheel’s mounting surface and its centerline, profoundly impacts suspension geometry and tire clearance. An incorrect offset can cause rubbing against suspension components or the vehicle’s body. It can also alter the vehicle’s handling characteristics. An off-road enthusiast, opting for wheels with an aggressive offset, discovered his tires rubbing against the fender liners during articulation. This not only damaged the vehicle but also compromised its off-road performance, illustrating the need for careful offset consideration.
-
Brake Caliper Clearance
The internal wheel design must provide adequate clearance for the brake calipers. An incompatible wheel may physically interfere with the caliper, preventing proper installation or, even worse, causing damage to the braking system. A mechanic, rushing to install aftermarket wheels without checking caliper clearance, found himself unable to fully seat the wheels, leading to a dangerous situation. This highlights the need for careful inspection of wheel design relative to brake caliper dimensions.
These facets, intricately linked to the 2009 F-150’s prescribed “bolt pattern,” underscore the imperative of verifying wheel compatibility. Straying from these specifications invites potential safety hazards, diminished performance, and costly repairs. While aesthetic preferences are valid, they must never supersede the fundamental principles of safe and compatible wheel fitment.
3. Lug Nut Torque
The 2009 F-150’s wheel security isn’t merely a function of the correct “2009 f150 bolt pattern”; it’s a symphony of precision, where “Lug Nut Torque” conducts the orchestra. This specified torque, a precisely calibrated twisting force, is the linchpin holding the wheel assembly together. Undertightening yields a loose connection, a gradual loosening that culminates in wheel detachment, a terrifying prospect at highway speeds. Overtightening, conversely, stresses the studs, stretching the metal beyond its yield point, leading to fatigue, eventual cracking, and, ultimately, stud failure. Consider the narrative of a seasoned rancher, familiar with the F-150’s capabilities but dismissive of the torque specifications. Armed with an impact wrench and a “feel” for tightness, he routinely overtightened the lug nuts after changing tires. Over time, hairline fractures developed in the studs, invisible to the naked eye. One sweltering afternoon, while hauling a trailer loaded with livestock, the accumulated stress gave way. A wheel sheared off, sending the trailer careening, a near-fatal encounter illustrating the critical importance of adhering to the specified lug nut torque.
The appropriate torque value, typically found in the owner’s manual or on a sticker affixed to the doorjamb, isn’t an arbitrary number. It’s the result of careful engineering calculations, factoring in the stud material, thread pitch, wheel material, and the forces generated during braking and acceleration. This value ensures the clamping force is sufficient to maintain a secure connection without overstressing the components. Moreover, the torque process itself is crucial. A star pattern tightening sequence, gradually increasing the torque in stages, ensures uniform pressure distribution across the wheel mounting surface. Failing to follow this sequence can lead to uneven clamping, creating stress concentrations and increasing the risk of loosening or stud failure. A volunteer firefighter, responding to an emergency call, discovered the perils of neglecting this sequence. Hastily changing a flat tire after hours, he haphazardly tightened the lug nuts. The uneven clamping caused vibrations and, eventually, lug nut loosening. He narrowly avoided a collision due to the improperly secured wheel, a stark reminder that haste makes waste, especially when safety is at stake.
Lug nut torque, therefore, is not a detail to be overlooked; it’s a cornerstone of safe wheel installation and operation, intimately linked to the “2009 f150 bolt pattern.” It demands a calibrated torque wrench, a precise tightening sequence, and unwavering adherence to the manufacturer’s specifications. While the temptation to rely on “feel” may be strong, the potential consequences of error are simply too grave. The stability of the 2009 F-150, and the safety of its occupants, rest upon the shoulders of correctly torqued lug nuts. The tale of the rancher and the firefighter serve as potent reminders of this fundamental truth: precision and adherence to specifications are paramount when it comes to wheel security.
4. Hub Centricity
Within the realm of the 2009 F-150’s wheel mounting system, the “2009 f150 bolt pattern” dictates the wheel’s connection points, while “Hub Centricity” ensures the wheel is perfectly aligned with the axle. This alignment is not merely a matter of convenience; it is a fundamental principle of vibration-free operation and long-term mechanical integrity. The absence of proper hub centricity introduces stress points that can lead to premature component failure and, in extreme cases, catastrophic wheel detachment. The interaction of these two elements, bolt pattern and hub centricity, is a complex choreography of mechanical precision, where even the slightest misalignment can disrupt the entire system’s harmony.
-
The Burden of the Lugs
When wheels are not hub-centric, the lug nuts bear the entirety of the vehicle’s weight and absorb the brunt of road impacts. These lugs, engineered for clamping force, are ill-suited to endure the shearing forces generated by continuous weight-bearing and vibration. Consider the plight of a delivery driver, whose 2009 F-150 was fitted with aftermarket wheels lacking the correct center bore. Over time, the constant vibration and stress on the lug nuts caused them to loosen repeatedly, necessitating frequent tightening. Eventually, one stud sheared clean through, nearly causing a major accident. This incident demonstrates that when hub centricity is absent, the lug nuts become overloaded, and the potential for failure escalates dramatically.
-
The Silent Threat of Vibration
A wheel not perfectly centered on the hub introduces imbalance, translating into vibrations felt throughout the vehicle. These vibrations, often subtle at first, are a persistent assault on the suspension components, bearings, and even the vehicle’s frame. Imagine a travelling salesman, racking up hundreds of highway miles each week in his 2009 F-150. Unbeknownst to him, the wheels, though correctly bolted in place, lacked the precise hub-centric fit. The vibrations, initially dismissed as normal road noise, gradually worsened, leading to premature wear of his wheel bearings and noticeable degradation in handling. The insidious nature of these vibrations underscores the importance of hub centricity in maintaining a smooth and stable ride, safeguarding the longevity of other vital components.
-
Hub Rings: The Bridge to Compatibility
In situations where aftermarket wheels possess a larger center bore than the F-150’s hub, hub rings act as an essential bridge. These precisely machined rings fill the gap between the hub and the wheel, ensuring a snug, centered fit. Think of a custom car builder meticulously crafting his dream truck, a 2009 F-150 adorned with wheels designed for a different application. Lacking the correct center bore, he employed hub rings to perfectly align the wheels, eliminating any potential for vibration or stress. This meticulous approach showcases how hub rings offer a practical solution for maintaining hub centricity when using wheels not originally intended for the vehicle.
-
The Distortion of Braking Forces
During braking, particularly under heavy load, the forces exerted on the wheels are immense. Without hub centricity, these forces are unevenly distributed, creating stress concentrations that can warp brake rotors and reduce braking efficiency. Envision a construction foreman, regularly hauling heavy equipment with his 2009 F-150. His aftermarket wheels, not precisely hub-centric, subjected the brake rotors to uneven stress during each stop. This resulted in rotor warping, causing pulsating brakes and reduced stopping power, compromising safety on the job site. The story illustrates that hub centricity is not merely a matter of comfort; it’s a crucial element in maintaining consistent and reliable braking performance.
The narrative of the 2009 F-150’s wheel system is one of interconnected elements, where the “2009 f150 bolt pattern” establishes the foundation, and “Hub Centricity” ensures the wheels are perfectly aligned and supported. These stories highlight how the interaction between the two is critical to the safety, handling, and longevity of the vehicle. While cosmetic appearance may be a driving factor in wheel selection, neglecting hub centricity can lead to unforeseen consequences, diminishing the F-150’s renowned reliability and potentially placing its occupants at risk.
5. Aftermarket Options
The 2009 F-150, a canvas of steel and possibility, presents a world of “Aftermarket Options” intrinsically linked to its “2009 f150 bolt pattern.” This specification, a cornerstone of compatibility, dictates the very foundation upon which customization can occur. It is not merely a set of numbers; it is the gatekeeper to a realm of aesthetic and functional enhancements, where the allure of personalization must be tempered by the immutable laws of engineering.
-
The Illusion of Universal Fit
The aftermarket wheel industry thrives on the promise of enhancement, yet the siren song of “universal fit” often leads to perilous waters. The 2009 F-150’s 6x135mm specification renders most claims of universality false. Adapters, marketed as a solution for incompatible bolt patterns, introduce a new layer of complexity and potential failure. The tale of a landscaping contractor, seduced by the aesthetics of wheels designed for a Chevrolet, stands as a cautionary example. He employed adapters to bridge the gap in compatibility. However, the added stress on the wheel bearings and the inherent instability of the adapters ultimately led to a catastrophic wheel separation during a routine job, resulting in significant property damage and a stark realization of the limitations imposed by the 6x135mm specification.
-
The Siren Song of Offset and Stance
Altering a wheel’s offset, a seemingly innocuous modification, profoundly impacts the F-150’s handling and tire clearance. The allure of a wider stance, achieved through aggressive offset wheels, often clashes with the practical realities of fender well constraints and suspension geometry. Consider the experience of an off-road enthusiast, envisioning his 2009 F-150 transformed into a trail-conquering machine. He opted for wheels with a dramatically reduced offset, pushing the tires far beyond the fender wells. While the aesthetic transformation was initially pleasing, the tires quickly began rubbing against the fender liners during articulation, limiting suspension travel and compromising off-road performance. The lesson learned was that “Aftermarket Options” must be carefully calibrated to the vehicle’s intended use and the limitations imposed by its design.
-
Load Rating: The Unsung Hero
The aesthetic appeal of aftermarket wheels often overshadows the crucial consideration of load rating. The 2009 F-150, designed for hauling and towing, demands wheels capable of withstanding significant weight. Ignoring the specified load rating is an invitation to disaster, as demonstrated by the unfortunate tale of a small business owner who frequently used his F-150 to transport heavy construction materials. He chose aftermarket wheels based solely on their appearance, neglecting to verify their load capacity. During a routine delivery, the wheels buckled under the weight, causing a dangerous loss of control and significant damage to his truck and cargo. This incident serves as a potent reminder that “Aftermarket Options” must always prioritize safety and functionality over mere aesthetics.
-
The Quest for Perfect Balance
Achieving perfect wheel balance is paramount for a smooth, vibration-free ride. While aftermarket wheels offer a diverse array of styles, they may also introduce challenges in achieving proper balance, especially if they deviate significantly from the factory specifications. Imagine a long-haul trucker, experiencing persistent vibrations in his 2009 F-150 after installing aftermarket wheels. Despite repeated attempts by various tire shops, the vibrations persisted, causing discomfort and fatigue. The underlying issue was the wheel’s inherent imbalance, amplified by its design and the larger tire size. This experience highlights the importance of carefully evaluating the balance characteristics of “Aftermarket Options” and selecting wheels that can be effectively balanced for optimal ride quality.
The world of “Aftermarket Options” for the 2009 F-150 is a realm of exciting possibilities, yet it demands respect for the “2009 f150 bolt pattern” and the engineering principles it represents. These specifications, etched in metal and experience, serve as a guide, ensuring that customization enhances the vehicle’s performance and safety, rather than compromising it. The stories illustrate that “Aftermarket Options” must be approached with caution, prioritizing load rating, offset, and hub centricity over mere aesthetic appeal. The canvas of the F-150 is vast, but the brushstrokes of modification must be applied with care and precision.
6. Proper Installation
The 2009 F-150’s wheel mounting, governed by the “2009 f150 bolt pattern”, is not merely a mechanical connection; it’s a ritual requiring precision and adherence to established procedures. “Proper Installation” is not an optional addendum; it is an indispensable component of the 6x135mm configuration’s integrity. Neglecting this imperative can trigger a cascade of consequences, transforming a seemingly straightforward task into a potentially catastrophic event. The story of a rural mechanic, shortcutting the installation process after a long day, exemplifies this danger. He relied on an impact wrench alone, bypassing the torque wrench and star pattern tightening sequence. The uneven clamping force that resulted created stress points within the wheel. Over several weeks, these stresses manifested as hairline fractures in the wheel studs. One cold morning, while towing a trailer laden with firewood, the weakened studs failed, sending a wheel careening across the highway. The incident, narrowly avoiding a collision, starkly illustrated the perilous outcome of disregarding “Proper Installation” relative to the “2009 f150 bolt pattern.”
Further reinforcing this concept is the importance of surface preparation. The mating surfaces between the wheel and the hub must be clean and free of corrosion or debris. Any contamination can compromise the friction coefficient, leading to inaccurate torque readings and potential loosening. Consider the experience of a construction worker who, after a muddy day on the job site, reinstalled his wheels without cleaning the hub surfaces. The residual mud acted as a lubricant, causing the lug nuts to loosen despite being torqued to the specified value. The resulting vibrations damaged the wheel bearings, necessitating costly repairs and highlighting the often-overlooked importance of meticulous surface preparation as a key aspect of “Proper Installation”. Beyond surface preparation, thread engagement is crucial. Insufficient thread engagement of the lug nuts significantly reduces clamping force and increases the risk of stud failure. Using lug nuts with the correct thread pitch and ensuring adequate engagement are non-negotiable aspects of “Proper Installation,” intimately linked to the “2009 f150 bolt pattern.”
In conclusion, the relationship between “Proper Installation” and the “2009 f150 bolt pattern” is not merely correlational; it is causal. Neglecting the prescribed torque, tightening sequence, surface preparation, or thread engagement undermines the very foundation of wheel security. While the convenience of shortcuts may be tempting, the potential consequences, ranging from component damage to catastrophic wheel failure, far outweigh any perceived benefit. The stories of the mechanic and the construction worker stand as stark reminders that adherence to established procedures is not a matter of preference; it is an essential element in ensuring the safe and reliable operation of the 2009 F-150.
Frequently Asked Questions
The wheel mounting of the 2009 Ford F-150, governed by its unique arrangement, often elicits questions from owners seeking clarity and reassurance. These inquiries, born from concerns about safety, performance, and compatibility, demand precise and informed responses. The following addresses common concerns about this critical aspect of the vehicle’s design.
Question 1: What exactly does “2009 f150 bolt pattern” mean?
The “2009 f150 bolt pattern,” often expressed as 6x135mm, defines the precise arrangement of the lug studs on the wheel hub. The ‘6’ indicates the number of studs, while ‘135mm’ signifies the diameter of the circle they form. This specification dictates which wheels can be safely and securely mounted to the vehicle. Misunderstanding this measurement can lead to incompatible wheel fitment and potential safety hazards.
Question 2: Can I use wheels with a different arrangement if I use adapters?
While adapters may seem like a convenient solution for mounting wheels with a different arrangement, their use is generally discouraged. Adapters introduce an additional point of failure and can alter the wheel offset, potentially impacting handling and tire clearance. A technician, attempting to mount wheels from a different make onto a 2009 F-150 using adapters, experienced catastrophic wheel failure during a routine road test, highlighting the inherent risks involved.
Question 3: How important is it to torque the lug nuts to the correct specification?
Torquing lug nuts to the specified value is paramount for safe and reliable wheel mounting. Undertightening can lead to loosening and eventual wheel detachment, while overtightening can damage the studs and compromise their integrity. A fleet manager, neglecting to properly torque the lug nuts on a 2009 F-150 after a tire rotation, experienced a wheel separation on the highway, resulting in significant damage to the vehicle and a narrowly avoided collision.
Question 4: What happens if the center bore of the wheel doesn’t match the hub?
A mismatched center bore can lead to vibrations and stress on the lug nuts, as the wheel is not properly centered on the hub. While lug-centric wheels rely solely on the lug nuts for centering, hub-centric wheels utilize the hub for precise alignment. A delivery driver, unknowingly using wheels with an incorrect center bore on his 2009 F-150, experienced recurring vibrations and premature wear on the lug nuts, ultimately necessitating frequent tightening to avoid wheel loosening.
Question 5: Can I use aftermarket wheels with a different offset?
While aftermarket wheels offer a range of offset options, deviating significantly from the factory specification can negatively impact handling and tire clearance. An incorrect offset can cause rubbing against suspension components or the vehicle’s body. An off-road enthusiast, fitting wheels with an aggressive offset to his 2009 F-150, found his tires rubbing against the fender liners during articulation, limiting suspension travel and compromising off-road performance.
Question 6: How do I ensure I’m buying wheels with the correct load rating for my 2009 F-150?
The load rating of the wheels must meet or exceed the vehicle’s Gross Axle Weight Rating (GAWR). This information is typically found on a sticker on the driver’s side doorjamb. Failing to adhere to this specification can lead to wheel failure, particularly when hauling or towing heavy loads. A contractor, overloading his 2009 F-150 with construction materials while using wheels with an insufficient load rating, experienced catastrophic wheel failure, resulting in a costly accident.
In summary, understanding the wheel mounting arrangement and adhering to proper installation procedures are essential for maintaining the safety and reliability of the 2009 Ford F-150. Neglecting these crucial aspects can lead to potentially dangerous consequences, underscoring the importance of informed decision-making.
The subsequent section will delve into troubleshooting common wheel-related issues and providing practical solutions for ensuring optimal performance and longevity.
Essential Wheel Mounting Tips for Your 2009 F-150
Securing wheels to a 2009 F-150 is a task demanding precision. The 6x135mm arrangement dictates more than just fit; it defines safety. These tips are born from experience, lessons learned in garages and on roads less traveled.
Tip 1: Verify the Specification, Verify Again: The 6x135mm arrangement isn’t negotiable. Before purchasing wheels, confirm this specification with both the seller and the vehicle’s manual. A seasoned mechanic once trusted his memory, ordering wheels based on habit. The slight discrepancy in millimeters went unnoticed until installation, a costly error and a wasted afternoon. Trust the numbers, not assumptions.
Tip 2: Prioritize Load Rating Over Aesthetics: The F-150 is a workhorse. Ensure any aftermarket wheels meet or exceed the vehicle’s load rating. A landscaping business owner, focused on appearance, chose wheels with insufficient capacity. The wheels buckled under a load of gravel, a dangerous failure born from misplaced priorities.
Tip 3: Surface Preparation is Non-Negotiable: Clean the hub and wheel mating surfaces meticulously. Corrosion or debris introduces uneven clamping forces. A fleet mechanic, hurrying to replace a tire, neglected this step. The resulting vibrations damaged the wheel bearings, a preventable expense born from haste.
Tip 4: Invest in a Calibrated Torque Wrench: “Feel” is not a substitute for precision. Use a calibrated torque wrench and adhere to the manufacturer’s specified torque. An experienced rancher, relying on instinct, overtightened his lug nuts. The studs fatigued, leading to wheel separation on a remote highway. Precision trumps intuition.
Tip 5: Embrace the Star Pattern: Tighten lug nuts in a star pattern, ensuring even clamping force. A construction worker, eager to finish a job, tightened the nuts in a circular sequence. The uneven pressure warped the brake rotor, a subtle problem with significant consequences.
Tip 6: Re-Torque After 50 Miles: After installing or re-installing wheels, re-torque the lug nuts after approximately 50 miles. Settling can cause loosening, especially with new wheels. A delivery driver, experiencing vibrations after a tire change, ignored the warning signs. A loose wheel led to a near-miss incident, preventable with a simple re-torque.
These tips, gleaned from practical experience, are crucial for maintaining the integrity of the 2009 F-150’s wheel mounting system. Adhering to these guidelines ensures safety and reliability.
The following concluding section will synthesize the key points, reinforcing the importance of the arrangement in maintaining the overall performance and safety of the 2009 F-150.
Conclusion
The preceding exploration has illuminated the critical importance of the “2009 f150 bolt pattern.” This seemingly simple specification, 6x135mm, is the bedrock upon which the safety, performance, and reliability of the vehicle’s wheel mounting system rests. From load ratings and hub centricity to lug nut torque and proper installation, each element intertwines, forming an unbreakable chain of engineering imperatives. The narratives presented, drawn from the experiences of mechanics, drivers, and enthusiasts, underscore the potential consequences of neglecting these fundamental principles. The “2009 f150 bolt pattern” is not merely a suggestion; it is a mandate.
Consider the long and arduous journey. From the initial engineering blueprints to the final assembly line, the 6x135mm arrangement has remained a constant, a non-negotiable element in the 2009 F-150’s design. To deviate from this standard, whether through ignorance or misguided ambition, is to invite risk. This arrangement, in its unassuming simplicity, is a testament to the power of precision. It is a reminder that even the smallest detail can have profound consequences. Therefore, regard this arrangement as more than just a specification; view it as a covenant, a promise of safety and reliability forged in the crucible of engineering expertise. Ensure its integrity, and in doing so, ensure the integrity of the 2009 F-150. The road ahead depends on it.
